sigmaplot software (trial version 9.0 Search Results


sigmaplot version 9 0  (STATA Corporation)
96
STATA Corporation sigmaplot version 9 0
Sigmaplot Version 9 0, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sigmaplot version 9 0/product/STATA Corporation
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sigmaplot version 9 0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
component exponential function  (SYSTAT)
99
SYSTAT component exponential function
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Component Exponential Function, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/component exponential function/product/SYSTAT
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
component exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sigmaplot 4.0  (SPSS Inc)
90
SPSS Inc sigmaplot 4.0
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Sigmaplot 4.0, supplied by SPSS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sigmaplot 4.0/product/SPSS Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sigmaplot 4.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
stata v9.2  (STATA Corporation)
90
STATA Corporation stata v9.2
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Stata V9.2, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/stata v9.2/product/STATA Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
stata v9.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component exponential decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Melanopsin ganglion cells in the mouse retina independently evoke pupillary light reflex

doi: 10.1101/2024.05.14.594181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component exponential decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).

Article Snippet: For the analysis of the transient constriction during high light conditions, raw traces were fitted with a single component exponential function (R 2 > .90, SigmaPlot14.5, Systat).

Techniques: Injection